Minnesota Enacts First‑in‑Nation Law Requiring Mental‑Health Warnings On Social Media
In a historic move, Minnesota lawmakers and Governor Tim Walz have enacted the nation’s first law mandating “conspicuous mental‑health warning labels” on social media platforms. The measure aims to prompt users—especially youth—to pause and consider potential psychological impacts before engaging online.
What the Law Requires
Beginning July 1, 2026, every time Minnesotans open a social media site, a pop-up will appear with warnings about possible mental-health risks such as anxiety, depression, and body-image issues.
Warnings must remain visible until users consciously acknowledge them, and platforms cannot bury the notice in lengthy terms or allow permanent dismissal.
The messages will link to mental-health resources, including the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.
The Minnesota Commissioner of Health, alongside the Commerce Commissioner, will regularly update messaging based on mental-health research.
Enforcement falls to the state Attorney General's office, and the law was unanimously passed by both the House and Senate.
Why It Was Passed
Supporters say the pop-ups will serve as vital reminders about the mental-health consequences of prolonged social-media use. Advocates for youth mental health, like Erich Mische of SAVE, emphasize that the law doesn’t vilify platforms, but encourages “kids to take a step back.”
Representative Zack Stephenson likened the required warnings to those on cigarettes: an early step in addressing growing mental-health concerns without offering a complete solution.
Personal testimony played a significant role: parents like Tabbatha Urbanski shared heartbreaking stories, such as her son’s overdose following contact with a drug dealer via Snapchat, crediting social media with fueling anxiety, depression, and harmful behaviors.
Industry Pushback and Legal Concerns
Social media companies have signaled they may challenge the law, advocating free-speech rights and warning of constitutional risk . Kathleen Farley of Chamber of Progress criticized it, saying it could be a “clear First Amendment violation” and likened mandated warnings to “force‑feeding political opinion”.
Broader Context
The law follows similar but narrower policies, like Colorado’s requirement for timer alerts after prolonged use .
It aligns with a 2024 recommendation from then Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy to require mental-health advisories on social platforms.
The law is part of a broader state-led push—like attempts at age-appropriate data design and algorithm transparency—to protect young users from digital harms.
What’s Next
The law takes effect July 2026, beginning a new era in state-led digital regulation. Expect social media companies to mount legal challenges—in Minnesota and potentially elsewhere. Meanwhile, the Health and Commerce departments will draft warning guidelines, and the Attorney General’s office will develop enforcement strategies.
60° and Overcast
