Image
Negotiations between Anoka-Hennepin Schools and its teachers union, Anoka Hennepin Education Minnesota, remain unresolved after weeks of talks, leaving Minnesota’s largest school district on the brink of a potential teacher strike that could begin Thursday, Jan. 8.
As of Jan. 2, mediation efforts over winter break had failed to produce a settlement, despite an eight hour session involving both bargaining teams and a state mediator. A final mediation meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, Jan. 6, widely viewed as the last opportunity to avert a walkout.
The dispute places roughly 38,000 students and their families in a state of uncertainty, as district leaders prepare for possible school closures while union members weigh what could become the district’s first teacher strike in decades.

The current conflict stems from negotiations over a two year contract that expired June 30, 2025. After months of bargaining, tensions escalated in late December.
On Dec. 22, AHEM filed a formal notice of intent to strike after 98.5 percent of its more than 3,000 members voted to authorize job action. Under Minnesota law, the filing triggered a mandatory 10 day cooling off period and set Jan. 8 as the earliest possible strike date.
Negotiations resumed during winter break on Dec. 29 but ended without agreement. Talks intensified again on Jan. 2, when the district and union participated in a marathon mediation session that stretched for much of the day. By the end of the session, however, the parties remained divided on several core issues.
While progress has reportedly been made on some items, including preschool and special education pay, two major points of contention continue to dominate negotiations.
The first is healthcare. AHEM leaders argue that a roughly 22 percent increase in premiums under the district’s self insured health plan has effectively erased recent salary gains for many educators. Some teachers have reported monthly family insurance costs exceeding $1,500.
Union leaders contend that the district is presenting what they describe as a false choice between affordable healthcare and meaningful wage increases. District officials, for their part, say rising healthcare costs are a significant and unavoidable expense that must be addressed within existing financial limits.
The second issue is the district’s broader fiscal outlook. The Anoka-Hennepin School Board recently completed a three phase budget reduction and reallocation process totaling $22.2 million.
Earlier phases eliminated more than 200 administrative and central office positions. The final phase approved an additional $8.1 million in cuts for the 2026 27 budget cycle. District leaders have cited the expiration of federal pandemic relief funds and new state paid leave requirements as key drivers of what they describe as tight budget parameters.
With no agreement in place, district officials say they are obligated to prepare families and staff for the possibility of a strike next week.
If teachers walk out on Jan. 8, the district has announced that all K 12 classes would be canceled, along with regular bus routes. Athletics and extracurricular activities at all levels would be suspended. No alternative childcare would be provided, except for students already enrolled in the district’s Adventures Plus program. Some community education offerings, including certain adult enrichment and disability programs, are expected to continue.
District leaders emphasize that these preparations are not an indication that talks have ended, but rather a necessary step to ensure families have time to plan.
Attention is now focused on Tuesday’s scheduled mediation session. A settlement could still be reached, or the parties could agree to delay a strike to allow more time for negotiations. If no agreement is reached, teachers could begin picketing later in the week.
Families, staff, and community members are encouraged to review updates and frequently asked questions on the district’s negotiations website and to monitor email and text alerts for time sensitive information.
For now, the outcome hinges on whether both sides can bridge the gap between educator compensation demands and the financial constraints facing a district still adjusting to post pandemic realities.