Image
The discussion emerged amid a review of the sheriff’s office budget, where officials confirmed a 2025 budget overrun estimated between $11.7 million and $15.4 million, driven largely by overtime costs and a high-intensity patrol initiative known as Operation Metro Surge.
County officials attributed the deficit primarily to staffing-related overtime and expanded enforcement activity. Despite the overage, the Hennepin County Board voted unanimously to cover the shortfall using the county’s unrestricted fund balance, ensuring continuity of operations.
The sheriff’s office budget, estimated at approximately $170 million, remains one of the county’s largest public safety expenditures.
During the meeting, Greene questioned whether the sheriff’s office should serve as a primary provider of public safety services across the county.
“I’m not willing to fund the sheriff to provide public safety for Hennepin County,” Greene said during the discussion, adding that she does not believe the office is structured to take on that role effectively.
Greene argued that primary responsibility for street-level public safety should rest with municipal police departments, suggesting the county should reconsider how resources are allocated across agencies.
In subsequent clarification, Greene stated her position was rooted in fiscal accountability, emphasizing that all departments must operate within approved budgets to maintain long-term service stability.
Greene’s comments prompted immediate response from other commissioners, including Heather Edelson, who cited Minnesota law governing the role of county sheriffs.
Under Minnesota Statute 387.03, sheriffs are required to “keep and preserve the peace of the county,” a mandate that includes enforcement responsibilities, custody operations, and support for broader public safety functions.
The remarks drew coordinated pushback from law enforcement leaders across Hennepin County.
A coalition of more than 40 mayors and police chiefs submitted a formal letter to the county board describing the sheriff’s office as an “indispensable part” of the regional public safety system. The letter emphasized the office’s role in providing shared services that many municipalities rely on, including:
Local officials stated that reducing or redefining the sheriff’s role could disrupt coordination across jurisdictions, particularly for smaller cities without full-service departments.
Dawanna Witt issued a response stating that Greene’s comments conflict with long-standing practice, state law, and operational realities within the county’s public safety system.
The sheriff’s office maintains that its responsibilities extend beyond support functions and include direct contributions to countywide safety and enforcement.
The issue has highlighted broader questions about the structure of public safety delivery in Minnesota’s largest county, including:
No immediate policy changes have been adopted. However, county officials are expected to continue discussions as part of ongoing budget planning and operational review.
MinneapoliMedia | Community. Culture. Civic Life.