Image
Tim Walz moved Thursday to reshape one of the most consequential and least visible engines of state government: the environmental permitting system that determines when factories expand, when wind farms rise, and when wastewater plants modernize.
On February 13, 2026, the governor signed Executive Order 26-03, directing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to reduce turnaround times, expand online transparency, and pilot artificial intelligence tools in a sweeping modernization of how Minnesota reviews air, water, and land permits.
The MPCA currently oversees more than 28,000 permits at over 22,000 sites statewide, a regulatory footprint that touches nearly every sector of the state’s economy. The administration says the goal is not to dilute environmental safeguards, but to make decisions faster and more predictable for businesses, communities, and local governments navigating the system.
Among the most immediate directives is the launch of a two-stage air permitting process by March 1, 2026 for qualifying projects.
Under the model, certain construction activities could begin once preliminary air approvals are secured, even as final operating conditions are refined. Supporters argue this could shorten the lag between investment decisions and groundbreakings, particularly for clean energy, manufacturing, and infrastructure projects that require extensive technical review.
Minnesota law already sets efficiency goals for air permits, including a 150-day target for construction-related air permits in many cases. But industry groups have long argued that more complex “Tier 2” permits can stretch far beyond that window. A 2025 analysis from the Minnesota Chamber Foundation found that while simple permits are often issued in under 30 days, the median wait time for complex air permits approached 600 days.
The governor’s order requires the MPCA to review those statutory efficiency goals, affirm or revise them, and embed measurable speed targets into the agency’s 2024–2028 Strategic Plan.
The modernization push goes further than internal benchmarks.
The executive order directs MPCA to pilot artificial intelligence tools to identify bottlenecks and reduce permit timelines. It also mandates a transition toward fully online, web-based application formats, replacing legacy paper systems and fragmented digital workflows.
By April 1, 2026, the agency must upgrade its Permit Application Tracker, expanding the public’s ability to see where an application stands in the pipeline. The administration says the enhanced tracker will offer clearer status updates and ongoing improvements so applicants and communities alike can follow projects in real time.
In addition, MPCA must annually publish a list of environmental consultants who successfully submit complete applications at least 80 percent of the time. The measure is intended to reduce delays caused by incomplete filings and encourage higher-quality submissions from private consultants.
The executive order also brings the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development into a more formal partnership with regulators.
Through Minnesota Business First Stop, an interagency office that helps complex projects navigate state government, DEED will convene at least two meetings per year to gather feedback from businesses and local officials about the regulatory environment and the permitting “customer experience.”
By December 1, 2026, DEED and MPCA must submit a joint report to the governor’s office identifying regulatory gaps, benchmarking Minnesota against other states, and recommending additional steps to improve efficiency without compromising environmental review.
Walz has framed the overhaul as a necessary alignment between environmental protection and economic development, particularly as Minnesota pursues ambitious clean energy and climate goals under its Climate Action Framework.
Wind farms, solar arrays, transmission lines, industrial decarbonization projects, and wastewater upgrades all require permits. If those approvals take years, administration officials argue, the state risks falling behind on emissions reductions and infrastructure modernization.
Critics of permitting delays have said that unpredictability, more than strictness, has been the most significant barrier. Environmental advocates, meanwhile, are watching closely to ensure that speed does not erode public participation or technical rigor.
The executive order does not alter statutory environmental standards. It does, however, make “speed” and transparency formal performance metrics for agency leadership, requiring an annual progress report beginning October 1, 2026, to measure whether reforms are reducing backlogs.
Environmental permitting rarely dominates headlines, yet it governs some of the largest economic and ecological decisions in the state.
With more than 28,000 active permits under MPCA oversight, even incremental reductions in review times could reshape project timelines across industries. The question now is whether modernization, digital upgrades, and AI tools can deliver on the governor’s promise: a system that is both rigorous and responsive, protective and predictable.
For Minnesota, the balance between growth and guardianship has always defined its environmental identity. Executive Order 26-03 attempts to recalibrate that balance not by loosening the rules, but by accelerating how they are applied.