Image
The legislation, known as the Medical Assistance Protection Act, or MAP Act, is being led by Representative Matt Norris of Blaine alongside Keith Ellison and Senate sponsors working on companion legislation in the Minnesota Senate.
Supporters of the bill describe it as a direct response to a sharp increase in Medicaid fraud referrals and growing concerns over the scale and sophistication of organized fraud schemes targeting Minnesota’s Medical Assistance system.
According to the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, referrals connected to suspected Medicaid fraud activity have nearly tripled since late 2025, while the state’s Medical Assistance program has expanded from roughly $13 billion at the time current staffing levels were established to approximately $20 billion today.
The proposal would expand the Attorney General Office’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit from 32 employees to 50 employees through the addition of 18 new positions, including 11 investigators, three attorneys, and four support staff members.
State officials say the staffing increase aligns with recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, which oversees Medicaid fraud enforcement standards nationwide.
Representative Norris said the legislation is intended to strengthen Minnesota’s long-term fraud enforcement infrastructure while improving the state’s ability to investigate and prosecute complex financial crimes involving taxpayer-funded health programs.
“This bill does what Minnesotans expect us to do,” Norris said during legislative discussions on the proposal. “It enhances our ability to investigate fraud and stiffens penalties for those who steal from government programs.”
Under current law, investigators within the Attorney General’s Office often must rely on county attorneys to obtain certain financial records during criminal investigations. The MAP Act would grant the office direct authority to subpoena financial documents in Medicaid fraud cases, a change supporters say would reduce administrative delays and accelerate investigations.
The legislation also proposes major criminal penalty changes tied to high-dollar fraud cases.
Among the bill’s provisions are new sentencing tiers for large-scale fraud involving losses exceeding $100,000 and $1 million. Supporters say the changes are designed to align penalties for government program theft with penalties already associated with comparable private-sector financial crimes.
The proposal would additionally add Medical Assistance fraud offenses to Minnesota’s racketeering statutes, commonly known as RICO statutes, giving prosecutors expanded authority to pursue organized criminal enterprises involved in coordinated fraud operations.
Additional provisions would extend statutes of limitation for Medicaid fraud prosecutions and strengthen the state’s ability to recover taxpayer funds lost through fraudulent schemes.
Attorney General Ellison’s office says Minnesota’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit has secured hundreds of convictions and recovered more than $90 million in restitution and financial recoveries in recent years. State officials have also argued that additional staffing is necessary as fraud investigations increasingly involve large-scale financial transactions, shell organizations, and multijurisdictional operations.
Supporters of the legislation have also emphasized the bill’s federal funding structure.
Under federal Medicaid fraud enforcement rules, the federal government provides a 75 percent reimbursement match for qualifying Medicaid fraud investigation costs through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Norris told lawmakers the matching formula substantially lowers the long-term financial burden on the state while allowing Minnesota to expand investigative staffing capacity.
“For every dollar Minnesota invests in this unit, the federal government contributes three more,” Norris said during committee testimony.
Debate surrounding the legislation has included discussions over whether the expanded staffing should receive one-time or ongoing funding. Lawmakers supporting permanent funding have argued that sustained staffing levels are necessary for Minnesota to maximize federal reimbursement eligibility and maintain continuity within specialized investigative teams.
The MAP Act is also moving through the Minnesota Senate as part of broader supplemental budget and public integrity discussions during the closing weeks of the 2026 legislative session.
If approved by both chambers and signed into law, the legislation would mark one of the largest expansions of Minnesota’s Medicaid fraud enforcement system in recent years.
MinneapoliMedia | Community. Culture. Civic Life.